9th
Rant - Redundancy Edition - Shakespeare’s “Dark” Comedies
A few years ago, James Urbaniak wrote on his blog about how he was sick of reading how Cymbeline was “rarely produced” in every review of every Cymbeline production. That at one point the play wasn’t performed regularly, but now it has entered into the common repertory. (Off the top of my head I figure Henry VIII, Merry Wives, Troilus and Cressida, and Timon of Athens would ACTUALLY be rarely produced).
I am similarly siiiiick of reading about how a director has bravely brought out the “icy depths” or “darkness” in the Comedies. ALL OF THE COMEDIES (except for Comedy of Errors which I defy you to laugh at sans elaborate physical business) HAVE DARKNESS WRITTEN INTO THEM. It’s there. It’s so painfully obvious that the darkness is an essential, irrefutable ASPECT of each of the texts. Just because the amateur and educational performance tradition of the comedies is to strip or play down all of the sharper/darker edges doesn’t mean that Shakespeare didn’t write them in in a plainly obvious fashion. A director isn’t innovative simply by allowing the darker aspects to have a prominent place in the production. All good comedy has serious stakes and underpinnings. Acknowledging and utilizing them is essential to properly performing the plays.
In fact, it has become accepted that the comedies are more psychologically and emotionally complex to such a degree that I’m more surprised when I see a high-profile production that DOESN’T acknowledge the darkness a la last summer’s Twelfth Night in Central Park.
ANNNNND breathe.